Bestiary of Bots

From notfoundon
Revision as of 01:56, 11 November 2020 by Ccl (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

WikiWikiWeb

Wiki wiki is the first Hawai'ian term I learned on my first visit to the islands. The airport counter agent directed me to take the wiki wiki bus between terminals. I said what? He explained that wiki wiki meant quick. I was to find the quick bus. I did pick up a book about the language before my return home. I learned many things from this but wiki wiki is the word that sticks the most. (source)

300px

Whose software are we using?

Video recording of Ward Cunningham talking about the wiki.

What is a wiki?

In 1995 Ward Cunningham described a wiki as "the simplest online database that could possibly work." The wiki was a way to share and collaborate on code and code-related ideas in a casual way. In fact, the wiki followed principles such as the collective code ownership, or code stewardship.

More design principles here.

The first ever wiki site was created for the Portland Pattern Repository in 1995 and it was called WikiWikiWeb (sometimes WardsWiki). 

"Be prepared for a bit of CultureShock, though - there is no NPOV on WardsWiki and many clever people have visited with ideas that don't always play well together. The advantage of this Wiki is in the freedom, simplicity, and power it offers."

Some of the components of this wiki were:

  • The landing page.
  • A section to welcome visitors.
  • Indexes that serve as "roadmaps".
  • A selection of pages that could serve as starting points.
  • A listing of things to think about.
  • Already back then, there was a significant number of wiki social norms:
    • The norm of norms; take everything with a grain of salt.
    • Use your real name and write in a way others will understand.
    • This wiki was created for the discussion of patterns, particularly software design patterns. Its users have chosen to broaden that focus.
    • There are two ideal forms for contributions; most pages contain a mixture of both.
    • Never intentionally misrepresent or suppress other people's opinions. Be especially careful about deletion.
    • Unless they say otherwise, don't mess with people's home pages, except to leave them notes.
    • EnglishPlease. This particular Wiki is in English, and thus non-English pages are discouraged (with a few exceptions, such as the InternationalOneMinuteWiki). However, PublicWikiForums exist in many different languages, and there even exist a few MultiLingualWiki?s.
    • If you care about literature, you can discard any of these rules to help bring down this and other base projects.
      • Huh?
  • The site is still active today.


There were many other pages where the users of the wiki tried to self-regulate dealing with conflict, for example a page on only saying things that can be heard or how to react to a flame, or letting it be.

Today we will be taking an amateur design ethnography approach in relation to the wiki. What characteristics can you distinguish in Cunningham's wiki culture? Focus on one specific aspect of the wiki. What are the needs, language, concepts and beliefs that emerge from these pages? Take notes of your observations and don't worry about making assumptions for the purpose of this exercise.


Wikipedia's Eternal September

Jimmy Wales

The person who provided the funding for the early beginnings of Wikipedia is Jimmy Wales, a libertarian entrepreneur.

In 1996, he and two partners founded Bomis, a web portal featuring entertainment and adult content.

The success of Bomis generated the income for the free peer-reviewed encyclopedia, Nupedia (2000–2003), and its successor, Wikipedia. 

“As it turned out, a clear mistake of mine and others was to assume that such a complicated system would be navigated patiently by many volunteers, even if they had clear-enough instructions”. (Sanger, 2004)

The wiki was initially a secondary implementation of the Nupedia project. The Nupedia wiki was atached to the main blog to generate content from a wider audience, later to be edited by experts in their respective fields. 

“Many of our first controversies were over these restrictions. At the time, I had enough influence within the community to get these policies generally accepted. And if we had not decided on these restrictions, Wikipedia might well have ended up, like many wikis, as nothing in particular. But since we insisted that it was an encyclopedia, even though it was just a blank wiki and a group of people to begin with, it became an encyclopedia.” (Sanger, 2004)

In 2001, Wikipedia is launched.

300px

Wikimedia came before Mediawiki

UseModWiki was based on the code of AtisWiki → AtisWiki was based on CvWiki → CvWiki was the first GNU-licensed wiki based on WikiBase, the wiki engine of the original WikiWikiWeb by Ward Cunningham. (source)

When Wikipedia was launched in January 2001, it ran on an existing wiki software system, UseModWiki. → Mediawiki was developed for use on Wikipedia in 2002. → The Wikimedia Foundation was announced on June 20, 2003. → In July, Wikipedia contributor Daniel Mayer, suggested the name "MediaWiki" for the software, as a play on "Wikimedia". → MediaWiki was originally developed by Magnus Manske and improved by Lee Daniel Crocker. Its development has since then been coordinated by the Wikimedia Foundation.

The software is optimized to efficiently handle large projects, which can have terabytes of content and hundreds of thousands of hits per second.

(source)

Because of its scale and longevity, Wikipedia is often presented as an analogy for systems of governance. It has been included in the discourse of collaboration, networking, transparency, knowledge production and horizontal ruling. However, as in many peer production project, there are a number of problems that Wikipedia is facing:

  • declining number of (new) users,
  • gender & race-based content and user imbalance,
  • conflicts between the Wikimedia Foundation, which owns the domain names and servers on which the Wikipedia content resides, and the community of volunteer contributors.


Wikipedia as a community has five pillars:

  • Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
  • Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view
  • Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute
  • Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility
  • Wikipedia has no firm rules

Wikipedia is not: a paper encyclopedia, a dictionary, a publisher of original thought, a soapbox or means of promotion, a mirror or a repository of links, images or media files, a blog, a web-hosting service, a social networking, a service, a memorial site, a directory, a manual, a guidebook, a textbook, a scientific journal, a crystal ball, a newspaper, an indiscriminate collection of information, censored, an anarchy, a democracy, a bureaucracy, a battleground, and finally, it is not compulsory (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not). Wikipedia defines itself by establishing limitations.

What Wikipedia is not


Deletionists versus Inclusionists

Deletionists were of the opinion that in order to maintain a coherent whole, pages of the encyclopedia which were not of vital importance must be deleted.

Inclusionists, on the other hand, proclaimed that as long as the quality of the articles respected the standards of the community, an article about “a small- town elementary school is no less worthy for inclusion than an article on Stanford University”.

In 2006 the deletionists win.

From anarchy to bureaucracy. Access and decision making over what content to include determine the hierarchical status of the contributors. False representation of Wikipedia as an open system continues.

The groups of users in order of status, from lowest to highest are:

blocked users < unregistered users < new users < registered (confirmed) users < bots < administrators < bureaucrats < stewards < developers < system administrators


Bot Bestiary

Technological systems, unlike social systems are easier to scale up. For this reason, delegating responsibility to machines is an increasing phenomenon in areas of life that affect individuals to a high degree.

The bot community has grown together with the population of Wikipedia out of necessity, taking over editor responsibilities that require repetition, such as reverting vandalism. Currently bots take up administrative or authorial roles. 

“The parasite invents something new. He obtains energy and pays for it in information. He obtains the roast and pays for it with stories. Two days of writing the new contract. He establishes an unjust pact; relative to the old type of balance, he builds a new one. He speaks in a logic considered irrational up to now, a new epistemology and a new theory of equilibrium. He makes the order of things as well as the states of things — solid and gas — into diagonals. He evaluates information. Even better: he discovers information in his voice and good words; he discovers the Spirit in the wind and the breath of air. He invents cybernetics.” (Serres, p. 35)

There are currently 2,455 bot tasks approved for use on the English Wikipedia.

How is the Wikipedia community changed by the interaction between humans and bots?

How do bots articulate the 'openness' of the platform?

How are the conflicts that arise between the two types of agents being mediated?

And what role these bots have in strengthening the already existing bureaucracy?

Other wikis

Some Further Notes

Retrieved from "https://notfoundon.org/here/index.php?title=Bestiary_of_Bots&oldid=3918"